Δεν σας αρέσει; Δεν πειράζει! Μπορείτε αν θέλετε να κάνετε επιστροφή εντός 30 ημερών.
Δεν θα κάνετε ποτέ λάθος με μια δωροεπιταγή. Χαρίστε στους αγαπημένους σας την επιλογή να διαλέξουν οι ίδιοι οτιδήποτε από τη συλλογή μας.
30 ημέρες για την επιστροφή των προϊόντων
Congress and the Department of Defense (DOD) are engaged in an extended discourse over the future direction of U.S. defense strategy and military force structure. In the past, these discussions have focused almost exclusively on questions related to U.S. conventional military forces, with discussions about nuclear weapons held in separate fora. However, the 2005 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) examined both nuclear and conventional forces, a first in the QDR s history. This indicates that analysts both inside and outside government are beginning to review and assess the potential deterrent and operational relationship between conventional and nuclear weapons. It appears that considerable pressure is building on DOD leaders to make strategy and force structure decisions with cost-effectiveness in mind. A key question for contemporary defense planners is what proportion of U.S. military capabilities should be focused on traditional military challenges and what proportion should be focused on non-traditional challenges, such as irregular, disruptive and catastrophic threats?